Showing posts with label Tracking Station. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tracking Station. Show all posts

Friday, March 4, 2011

Hartebeesthoek - 50th Anniversary

Reflections of a Sixties "Tracker"

The Iconic 85' Dish (1965)

I want to be with you under a Southern Sky
Feel the earth move as I see you walking by
I want to take you to the moon and back tonight
Sleep with angels in the shelter of a perfect Southern Sky
In the stillness and forgiveness of a perfect Southern Sky
                                                        -Mango Groove

March 2011 marks the Golden Jubilee of the Hartebeesthoek's 85' Deep Space Dish Antenna located in the foothills of the Magaliesberg. Today this precision instrument is no longer used by NASA for its Space Programme but is dedicated instead to Radio Astronomy. Nevertheless, the story of the beginnings of the Hartebeesthoek Tracking Station is worth recalling not only for its historical significance but also for the impact it had on my own life.

It was at Hartebeeshoek that I first started work. Back in the 1960s with the Space Race at its height, a career in Space Research, was many an aspiring young boy's dream. Hartebeesthoek left an indelible mark on my life that I continue to appreciate. I will always remain indebted to colleagues and mentors, lecturers and trainers, engineers and technicians, storemen and security personnel, secretaries and librarians, mess and bunker room staff,  far too many to record by name, who in one way or another, had a formative influence on my life.

DSIF-51 Staff Photo (1970)

In the late 1950s NASA required round the globe tracking coverage for its proposed deep space unmanned missions. Goldstone (DSIF 11, 1958) in California and Woomera (DSIF 41, 1960-1972) were obvious choices. The third element in the envisaged Deep Space Network (DSN) fell in the longitude that would make either Spain or South Africa suitable options. While NASA preferred Spain, South Africa had a geographical advantage that could not be ignored. The launch path of the space probes from Cape Canaveral passed directly over South Africa. This was a critical phase in  the launch of a spacecraft. Invariably DSIF-51 would be the first to confirm or otherwise a successful launch and trajectory. Another deciding factor was the so-called "Southern dwell" of the planets at that time which gave South Africa and Australia a geo-astronomical advantage. The geographical position of South Africa was therefore of considerable strategic advantage. Despite some serious political and diplomatic qualms, the choice eventually tilted in South Africa's favour. NASA's first global Deep Space Network, Goldstone-Woomera-Hartebeesthoek, was linked by means of existing and developing communication lines to the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) Control Centre in Pasadena, California.

Sputniks and Explorers fired our young imaginations. I had just commenced High School when, in September 1960, an agreement was concluded by NASA with the South African government and the CSIR for the construction of the Deep Space Instrumentation Facility (DSIF 51, 1961-1974) north-west of Johannesburg. It would operate under the auspices of the National Institute for Telecommunications Research (NITR) of the CSIR. NASA was anxious to have the facility operational in time to provide essential support for the first launch of the Ranger missions to the Moon. This was scheduled to commence in July 1961. "To prepare the site, erect the antenna, install and test the equipment, and train personnel in its operation, under the pressure of a high profile mission like Ranger, posed a formidable challenge for everyone involved," wrote NASA historian Douglas J Mudgway (1: p23). This was no mean undertaking. I followed the progress with a great deal of interest not realising that I'd one day be working there.

The iconic, almost eight storey high, parabolic dish antenna is to this day still a monument to the vision of the original planners, negotiators, construction and installation engineers, and of project and station managers. Construction work began in November 1960 and was completed by July in good time for the anticipated Ranger Missions. This huge undertaking involved construction of roads and the preparation of the site, the trucking and shipping of sophisticated equipment and components from the USA  to Hartebeesthoek. Staff had to be employed and trained. The erection of the 85' antenna started in January 1961 was completed in 69 days on the 25th March 1961. Extensive electronic and communication installations had to be tested and calibrated. Despite heavy summer rains impeding the laying of foundations, the erection of buildings, and provision of on-site power generators, Hartebeesthoek was ready for operations by the 1st July 1961. Unfortunately the worsening political situation in South Africa prevented NASA from participating officially in the locally arranged Opening Ceremonies (1: p 25). Eventually the  political situation would lead to the closure of the Tracking Facility in June 1974 whereafter the facilities were commissioned for purposes of Radio Astronomy. It is now know as the Hartebeesthoek Radio Astronomy Observatory (HRAO).

Despite the turmoil of the 1960s, Hartebeesthoek made a vital contribution to space research during those crucial, early years of space exploration. It provided tracking support for upto 38 spacecraft over its 13 years of  its operation. Some of the projects included:

The Pioneer Missions into Deep Space  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pioneer_program
The Ranger Missions to the Moon http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ranger_program
Lunar Orbiters http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_Orbiter_program
Surveyor Lunar Landings http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveyor_Program
Mariner IV to Mars http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mariner_IV
Mariner V Mission to Venus http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mariner_V
Mariner VI to Mars http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mariner_VI
Apollo 15 Mission to the Moon http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_15

At one point Hartebeesthoek, in 1963, held the record for long-distance communications.  "Our DSIF station had the distinction of being the first in the DSIF network to successfully transmit a Command to Mariner 2. It was also the last station to contact Mariner, and as such holds the world's long distance communication record of about 54 million miles," said Dr Naude, President of the CSIR. Of course this has since been surpassed by larger tracking antennas and more sophisticated electronics. But at the time it was a notable achievement.

(For mission images see: http://www.hartrao.ac.za/other/dss51/missions.html)

"....a key element in all of those dramatic spacecraft events, the DSN shared their excitement, but saw a quiet , unreported drama of its own. There were occasions when the success or failure of a multimillion spacecraft, the reputation of NASA, or the recovery of critical science data from a far planet, lay in the hands of the DSN and, not infrequently, those of a crew member at a distant tracking station....  often though, the determined, sometimes heroic, efforts of engineers and technicians in laboratories at JPL, and in control rooms and antennas at remote tracking stations, provided drama enough for those of us who were aware of it." (1: xxi)

Celebrating the Fifth Anniversary of the International Tracking Networks in 1963, Dr S M Naude, president of the CSIR, remarked, "The tracking of satellites and space probes is an arduous task. There are moments of tense drama which even the veteran tracker cannot resist, but there are proportionately more humdrum moments when machinery and instruments have to be cleaned and overhauled. The responsibility, the excitement and the routine of tracking call for special qualities of personality and character, and I am profoundly grateful that these are evidenced in abundance in the work of Dr. Hewitt, Mr. Hogg, Mr. Botha and the 80-odd scientists and technicians who man the combined Radio Space Research Station. Credit is also due to their wives and families for accepting the irregular hours of work at the station...the D.S.I.F. station crew was divided into three shifts of 10 people, each shift working for about 18 hours a day." (3)

Tracking staff included engineers and technicians from South Africa, Britain, the Netherlands, Germany, and Greece. Though proudly a facility based in Africa, South Africa's discriminatory legislation expressly excluded many from participating in this adventure into Space. This was to be its nemesis. I myself had to go to Pasadena and Goldstone in California before I really even became aware of this glaring anomaly and injustice.

Some of us, were not only fortunate but privileged to have been trained and employed as technicians in Space Communications at Hartebeesthoek from 1965 till December 1972. I, for instance, had the chance of a life time, to go to JPL and Goldstone for further training on one of the Mariner Mars missions. Many equally deserving South Africans were excluded from such opportunities.

I became acutely aware of the injustice. The writing was on the wall.  14th August 1971 American Congressman Charles Diggs, visited South Africa which included an inspection of Hartebeeshoek. The Apartheid policies of the South African government had become an embarrassment. Sanctions were being imposed. The American presence at Hartebeeshoek came increasingly under scrutiny. Larger tracking dishes and more sophisticated equipment no longer gave South Africa the leverage of its strategic geographical advantage. The Madrid Deep Space Communications Complex (MDSCC) now came into prominence. The closure of the Hartebeesthoek Tracking Station was finally announced in July 1973. The closure of DSIF-51 ironically resulted in long term positive spinoffs for both myself and for Hartebeesthoek itself.

For myself, in 1969 the Anglican Dean of Pretoria, the Rev Mark Nye had called for a space programme of the human spirit "to  tackle the far more difficult problems of man in his relationship to himself, to society and to God. If men can provide the resources, the skills, the astronomical sums of money, to put two men on the Moon, why cannot they direct themselves equally successfully to the ordering of their own lifes?" (Sunday Times, 10/6/69) This challenge couldn't be ignored much longer. By the time of Congressman Diggs' visit, I had already sensed a call to ministry. Diggs was a Baptist and an ardent Civil Rights and Anti-Apartheid Activist.  His visit, unpopular as it was, precipitated my decision to move on. I had come to the end of my contractual commitments and obligations to Hartebeesthoek.  I resigned and candidated for the Methodist ministry at the end of 1971. There were now other important, more urgent frontiers and missions beckoning me.

For Hartebeeshoek and others there were positive outcomes too. Highly skilled and experienced staff in some of the most advanced electronic technologies of the time were dispersed further afield, some were employed by local industries, others went abroad, a few remained at Hartebeeshoek. The impact of this kind of migration of skills and experience is immeasurable. Hartebeesthoek continued to advance the exploration of the Universe through its Radio Astronomy programme operating first under the CSIR, then the Foundation for Research Development (FRD), which later became the National Research Foundation (NRF) in 1999. Cooperating with Radio Astronomers in many parts of the world including South Africa, Hartebeesthoek has continued to provide invaluable support in groundbreaking 21st Century Space Research.

Dr George Nicolson, who headed up the Radio Astronomy Observatory, wrote, "When in 1974, NASA decided to close the Hartebeesthoek station, prohibitive transportation costs and the spirit of cooperation which exists among scientists all over the world resulted in some of the radio-tracking equipment being left behind for the use of the CSIR radio astronomers. The Hartebeesthoek Deep Space Station then became South Africa's Radio Astronomy Observatory...." (4). This expertise and technology remained in the country and has evolved to become one of the most significant research facilities in the country. A new era in South African astronomy had been born.

Unfortunately, toward the end of 2008, the large bearing of the 85'  dish antenna failed. This was a serious setback but it didn't daunt Hartebeesthoek. According to the HRAO website, the 85' antenna that had given faithful service for almost fifty years "was immediately shut down to prevent further damage. After extensive engineering investigation and consultation, the decision was taken to repair the telescope."  Acquiring and replacing a main bearing of this huge 200 tonne structure was in itself a major engineering feat. This remarkable achievement is documented on the pages of the HRAO website at  http://www.hartrao.ac.za/news/100906_26m_repair/index.html.  The fifty year old antenna was given a new lease of life and is operational once again, a worthy monument to South Africa's historic role in space exploration.

Working at Hartebeeshoek was for me not only a vicarious journey into Outer Space but it was also a virtual journey into my own Inner Space. In no small measure the experience was enriching, extending the boundaries of my own limited horizons and prejudices, broadening and deepening my understanding of my origins and place in an unimaginably vast Universe. The further we looked out upon the vast expanse of our Universe, listening to the miniscule signals coming from a lonely distant spacecraft the more conscious I became of a Transcendental Reality holding it all together. Often I would go outside at night and see the Dish pointed skyward focused on some remote, invisible star or probe in Space and I would become blissfully mindful of something that Jan Smuts once wrote. He was no stranger to the Magalieberg, he said:

"...we are indeed one with Nature, her genetic fibres run through all our being, our physical organs connect us with millions of years of her history; our minds are full of  immemorial paths of pre-human experience." (7: p.333)

...and then I'd remember that not very far from Hartebeesthoek where I was standing, peering ecstatically deep into the dark night sky were the Sterkfontein Caves. And I instinctively felt a profound connection between the two. I had come a very long way.

A recent visit to Hartebeesthoek (2010)

Hartebeesthoek has also come a long way. We wish "Harties" another fifty years of  many more exciting discoveries as it continues to probe ever further into our "perfect Southern Skies"!

oOo

For more about the Hartebeesthoek Radio Astronomy Observatorysee http://www.hartrao.ac.za/
and for some stunning photos  see http://www.hartrao.ac.za/gallery/

References:
1. Douglas J Mudgway, Uplink-Downlink, A History of the Deep Space Network 1957 - 1997,  NASA 2001
2. G Gray-Cobb, "The radio space research station, Hartebeesthoek", The Transactions of the SA Institute of Electrical Engineers, April 1964, p 163
3. Dr S M Naude, Speech "U.S. International Tracking Networks' Fifth Anniversary", The South African Engineer, March 1963.
4. Dr G D Nicolson, "Tuning in on the Universe", Scientiae, March 1980. p 10
5. Doug Hogg, "South Africa and the Exploation of Space", Scientiae, February 1975.
6. DSIF: Johannesburg, JPL Technical Memorandum No 33-224, 1965.
7 Jan C Smuts, Holism and Evolution, Macmillan (Third Edition), 1936

Related Blogs:
http://ichthyscybernetics.blogspot.com/2010/03/first-love-principle-of-first.html
http://ichthyscybernetics.blogspot.com/2010/03/first-love-continued-programming-and.html


















©Colin G Garvie HomePage: http://www.garvies.co.za

Monday, March 29, 2010

First Love (continued) - Programming and Pilgrimages

I still cannot get my mind round those amazing 16K SDS 920's we used for telemetry processing at NASA's Tracking Stations during the 1960's. So much achieved by so little! They were lean, mean machines! It was there too that I was first introduced to computer programming. Following on my previous post I need to share and document  my own indebtedness to the various computer programming languages that were undoubtedly, subtle, transforming agents in my life. In many respects a programmer's life is affected and effected by the languages he engages with.

At the Tracking Station we didn't have dedicated programmers. By virtue of the critical nature of the work, engineers and technicians responsible for the maintenance and repair of equipment also needed to know how to program and operate the computers. My initial exposure to programming was somewhat elementary. This evolved. Later, on entering the ministry with no access to computers I went into a barren digital wilderness for almost ten years. Then came the advent of the personal computer. A past professional interest became an enduring pastime. It progressed from low level to high level "Fourth Generation Language" (4GL) programming. Then I was suddenly thrust once again back, full time, into software development. It was a major transition from a pastoral charge to computerised accounting, a field I knew nothing about.  Much of life evolves that way too, from the simple to the sophisticated, from the known to the unknown, from the exoteric to the esoteric. Transitions!
Programming languages are really just vehicles to supply abstractions to programmers. People think of programming languages as being good or bad for a given purpose, but they are really criticizing the abstractions that a language embodies. The progress in programming languages has been incredibly slow because new programming languages are difficult to create and even more difficult to get adopted. When you have a new programming language, the users have to rewrite their legacy code and change their skills to accommodate the language. So, basically, new programming languages can come about only when there is an independent revolution that justifies the waste of the legacy, such as Unix which gave rise to C, or the Web which gave rise to Java. Yet it's not the languages that are of value, but only the abstractions that the languages carry. - Charles Simonyi (The Edge) quoted "Philosophy of Programming Languages", http://pcs.essex.ac.uk/pls.html

Some of my friends are interested in the history of computing so a brief introduction to each is not out of place here. Those not technically minded may skip to the foot of the blog!

Machine Code http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine_code
This was the most fundamental and primitive means of programming to which I was first introduced, manually coding in binary instructions on a 24 button and display console. No monitor. Just a bank of buttons and lights into which one could punch in code and values step by step and then run it. Even this was tedious for the simplest routine. This was eased somewhat by other input/output devices such as a typewriter or punch tape but these were relatively primitive compared to modern peripheral devices. As technician my objective was simply diagnostic, programming for fault finding.

Symbol http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assembly_language
"SYMBOL  is a  two-pass  assembler language for  the  SDS 900  series  and  9300  computers.   It was  designed to  operate on  a  minimal  4K  computer with  at least one  symbolic  input device  and at least one  output  device" (SDS 900 Series Symbol Technical Manual, SDS 900688A March 1965). This gave us the capability to do a little more than just diagnosis. One was enabled to be more versatile and analytic.

FORTRAN http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortran
One of the earliest computer languages, FORTRAN (an acronym for FORmula TRANslator) was designed to handle mathematical operations especially in scientific and engineering fields. It was ideally suited for our field of work.  Initially FORTRAN was unable to handle text manipulations of any sort, and could just barely place quoted text in its printed output. It also ran on a 4K SDS. With its mathematical functions one was now able to move from investigation to real-time application and data interpretation. Naturally this meant a paradigm shift as well.

Then came the period of my "Digital Doldrums". I had left the tracking station to enter pastoral ministry. However, with the advent of the IBM PC and later Desktop computers, I had access to computers once again. I graduated to more user friendly developers:

BASIC http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_programming_language
The Beginner's All-purpose Symbolic Instruction Code, BASIC, was the first interpreted language made available for general use on PCs. It is now in such widespread use that most people see and use this language before they deal with others. It has changed over time, and is now most commonly seen as Visual Basic in a Windows environment.

Pascal http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascal_Programming_Language
Named after Blaise Pascal (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blaise_Pascal), a French Catholic theologian and philosopher, mathematician, and physicist, Pascal was specifically designed as a teaching language. Its object was to force the student to correctly learn the techniques and requirements of structured programming. It was a process of conditioning, to think in a particular way.

The shift from a scientific to an ecclesiastical environment also meant a shift to database related languages with a focus on people both as a collective, the ecclesia, as well as seeing persons as individually unique and special. BASIC and Pascal complimented my hobbies in astronomy and amateur radio whereas the database languages opened up new application areas in church membership management and genealogical related programs:

dBase http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DBase
Interestingly, dBase had its roots at the Jet Propulsion Laboratories too. It was developed by C. Wayne Ratliff who was a contractor at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. dBase II became the first most popular database management system (DBMS). My first dBase applications involved Scottish IGI birth and marriage family records and library management.

Clipper http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clipper_%28programming_language%29
Clipper was a programming language and compiler for the widely used dBase III database systems. As with other DOS based languages Clipper and dBase evolved from a sequential to Objected Oriented Programming languages.

SQL http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SQL
Structured Query Language or SQL was developed by IBM and by the late 1970s a version was available for the IBM PC. It has become a popular database management language.
SQL Queries for Mere Mortals(R): A Hands-On Guide to Data Manipulation in SQL (2nd Edition)

Interested in Artificial Intelligence (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_Intelligence) and Information Theory (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_Theory) led to new avenues. These were interests engendered already during my early years at the Tracking Station. So for a while when opportunity allowed, I also dabbled with:

Prolog http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prolog
A very popular logic, artificial intelligence programming language. My interest was limited mainly to interrogating birth, marriage, and death registers for finding genealogical and family tree relationships. But the pursuit was short lived as new demands fell upon me.
Programming in Prolog: Using the ISO Standard
Finally, after fifteen years in pastoral administration, when I was deployed to our denominational head office where a conversion from a Unix, COBOL based system to a Novell/DOS platform was underway I had to acquaint myself with the newly implemented Clarion for DOS and eventually Clarion for Windows Rapid Application Developers (RAD). At the same time programming technology was moving from structured to Object Oriented Programming (OOP) methodologies  (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object-oriented_programming). Clarion for windows provided for both. This meant for me a major shift in programming approach and thinking processes.

Clarion http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clarion_Programming_Language
Clarion was implemented at our denominational headquarters in 1991. It is one of the more sophisticated dedicated business application, large database developers available today. One of Clarion's unique features was its pioneering work in template methodologies. The language continues to keep abreast with new technologies. Whether Clarion will maintain this role or whether it goes the way of past languages yet remains to be seen. But it cannot be discounted just yet. I was intrigued by its longevity and ability to evolve and incorporate new advances compared to some of the older dinosaurs. Sadly my own sixteen year professional relationship with Clarion came to an end once I went into retirement but the language itself continues to live on.
Developing Clarion for Windows Applications/Book and DiskClarion 6 Tips & Techniques
Each new programming language represents a stage not only in technological development but also, for the programmer, a stage in personal development and psychological growth. That gives programming languages, as with human languages, a spiritual and psychic dimension! For instance, the transition from structured to object orientated programming represented for me a transition from an Aristotelian to a Platonic worldview.  Discrete functions and routines were now in a way seen to be manifestations of platonic ideas, forms and archetypes. Initially programming for me, involved engaging hands on with man-made machines which later developed into the stewardship of records and relationships with living human beings. Interestingly Clarion embodies both models, "loud and clear" and accommodates happily with SQL, for instance. This journey has been a progression from the material to the spiritual, from task to abstractions, from the profane to the sacred. I pay tribute to the languages so formative in my life. Every journey is a pilgrimage. Therefore the Scallop Shell!

See also:
"Philosophy of Programming Languages, Online and offline resources", http://pcs.essex.ac.uk/pls.html
"Ancient Philosophy and Programming Languages" by cyocum (Curate), http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=349593


©Colin G Garvie
HomePage: http://www.garvies.co.za